We break your model’s answers into verifiable claims, check each against source, and return a grounded/ungrounded verdict per claim — plus the failure taxonomy that tells you what to fix first.
Pre-screened for fact-checking and source verification
Work in your eval platform or custom tooling
Specialists in legal, medical, finance, and more
One programme, run end to end, rating outputs for accuracy, verifies claims against sources, and catches hallucinations across any domain or language.
Domain experts across legal, medical, finance, and technical fields. Managed for fact-checking, source verification, and consistent rubric adherence.
Our delivery team operate inside your eval platform, annotation queue, or custom tooling. You control access. Your data stays where it is.
Tools: Any Text Annotation Tool
Built-in chat, instruction sharing, and everything you need to track delivery in one place. No separate apps required.
Pay our delivery team in any country from a single dashboard. You set the rates, we add a small fixed fee on top. No hidden costs, no chasing invoices.
Every batch is reviewed before it reaches you. You get a shortlist of qualified our delivery team ready to start working in your tools. What we deliver:
Scope a project, commission qualified our delivery team, and manage everything from one platform. Your data and tools stay exactly where they are.
Describe your audit scope, domains, and evaluation criteria. Receive proposals from our delivery team who have already been screened for fact-checking and domain expertise.
We agree the spec, then run delivery inside your eval platform, annotation software, or custom tooling.
Share instructions, message your team, and handle global payments from a single dashboard.
Send us a sample batch and we will come back with a spec and a quote.
A standing programme, run end to end, for continuous or large-volume work.
Specialists with domain expertise and fact-checking skills, ready to catch hallucinations in any field.
Send us your first batch and get managed our delivery team who have the domain expertise and fact-checking skills your project requires.
Common questions about delivery our delivery team on ReinforcedX for hallucination audit projects.
Deliver hallucination auditors on ReinforcedX, then invite them to any eval tool, staging environment, or your own internal sandbox.
Three ways to work with us, from a single batch to a standing programme.
Send us the spec and we scope the work, agree the quality bar, and start delivering. We run inside the tools you already use, so output lands where your team works.
We staff, run, and QA the whole programme inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
Keep a standing delivery pipeline running against your roadmap, with quality reported every week.
Typically within a week or two of a scope being agreed. The first delivery is deliberately a small batch so you can check the output against your expectations before volume ramps.
One process owner who knows the workflow, one engineer with access to the systems involved, and a weekly 45-minute review. No standing committee, and no requirement for an ML specialist on your side.
You do. Datasets, labels, weights, evaluation suites and runbooks are yours and are handed over at the end. Your data trains your models only, with zero-retention provider settings by default.
Yes, and the quality bar holds because the rubric and gold set are already agreed by that point. Ramping is a staffing question, not a re-scoping one, so it usually takes days rather than a new engagement.
Often you should not. The cases where teams move to us are when they cannot get a quality number out of their current vendor, or when the work is delivered as an opaque batch with no trace of how disagreements were resolved.
We stay on-call for 30 days at no extra cost, then move to an optional support retainer. Most teams also keep a quarterly evaluation review with us to catch drift early.
Copyright © 2026
ReinforcedX, Inc.
All rights reserved