AI Code Generation Consulting
Copilots and review agents that draft against your repos — and never merge unaudited generated code.
- Service
- Code AI
- Industry
- Technology
- Updated
- 2026-08-25
- Engagement
- 4 wks
AI code generation consulting helps engineering organizations put IDE copilots and pull-request review agents into production against your own repos, with retrieval of internal APIs and ADRs, CI gates for tests and secrets, and a hard rule that unaudited generated code cannot merge — typically one repo family in four weeks, with the client owning evals and policy.
Why teams pick this engagement
Code AI × TechnologyUnaudited code does not ship
Generated diffs fail CI without tests, secret scan, and a human review. There is no path from chat to main.
Repo RAG, not generic Stack Overflow
Completion and review pull your internal APIs, ADRs, and style — so the model suggests your client, not a blog’s.
Review comments with evidence
PR agents cite the failing test, the rule, or the ADR. “Looks wrong” without a locator is suppressed.
Authors still own the merge
Copilots draft; review agents comment. Merge remains a named engineer. Autonomous merge is out of scope for the first system.
Eval against senior review
Golden PRs measure catch rate on real defects, false-positive noise, and secret leakage — not “developer delight” surveys alone.
One repo family in four weeks
Policy, repo index, review bot or copilot config, CI gates, handover — then the same pattern for the next service.
Key takeaways
- 01
Copilots raise throughput only if review and CI catch the new failure modes: secrets, license-incompatible snippets, and plausible-but-wrong API use.
- 02
Ground generation and review in your repos and ADRs. Generic pretrained code will ignore your client libraries and your threat model.
- 03
Unaudited generated code must not reach main. Tests, secret scanning, and a human merge are release requirements, not culture slogans.
- 04
Review agents should be scored on golden PRs against senior review: catch rate versus noise. A noisy bot gets muted and then ignored.
- 05
One service or repo family in four weeks is the right first slice; turning on copilot org-wide with no evals is how you scale defects.
What the engagement covers
How we work
- 01
Discover
Repo inventory, existing copilot usage, CI, secret scanning, and the single repo family in scope.
- 02
Design
Context policy, merge gates, review-agent comments, and evals reviewed with security and platform.
- 03
Build
Repo index, copilot/review configuration, and CI gates in a pilot team’s workflow.
- 04
Validate
Golden-PR catch rate, false-positive noise, secret and injection tests, license policy.
- 05
Enable
Production for the repo family, runbooks, and 30 days on-call.
Take the playbook with you
The working documents from real engagements — free, in exchange for an email. They’re useful whether or not we ever talk.
Generated-Code CI Gate Spec
The checks that must pass before a copilot-authored diff can merge: tests, SAST/secrets, license, and human review evidence.
Get the spec ·PR Review Agent Golden-Set Template
How to build a set of historical PRs with known defects so a review agent is scored against senior review, not vibes.
Get the template ·